Liora a'r Gwehydd Sêr
A modren fairy tale that challenges an rewards. For aw that are ready tae tak on quaestens that bide - adults an bairns.
Overture
Nid fel chwedl y dechreuodd,
ond fel cwestiwn –
un na fynnai dewi.
Un bore Sadwrn.
Sgwrs am oruwch-ddeallusrwydd,
meddwl na ellid ei ysgwyd ymaith.
Ar y cyntaf, nid oedd ond amlinelliad.
Oer.
Trefnus.
Di-enaid.
Byd heb newyn,
heb loes llafur.
Ond gwag o’r cryndod hwnnw:
hiraeth.
Yna, camodd merch i’r cylch.
A’i sach yn trymhau
dan bwysau cerrig holi.
Holltau yn y perffeithrwydd
oedd ei chwestiynau.
Holai drwy ddistawrwydd,
yn llymach na’r un waedd.
Chwiliodd am yr anwastad,
canys yno mae bywyd yn tarddu,
yno mae’r edau’n cael gafael,
lle gellir clymu rhywbeth newydd.
Yna, torrodd y stori ei ffurf.
Aeth yn feddal
fel gwlith y golau cyntaf.
Dechreuodd wehyddu ei hun
a dod yn yr hyn a wehyddir.
Nid chwedl glasurol
yw’r hyn a ddarllenwch yn awr.
Gwead o feddyliau yw hwn,
cân wedi’i phlethu o gwestiynau;
patrwm yn chwilio am ei ffurf ei hun.
Ac mae teimlad yn sibrwd:
Nid cymeriad yn unig yw Gwehydd y Sêr.
Ef hefyd yw’r patrwm,
sy’n gweithio rhwng y llinellau —
sy’n crynu pan gyffyrddwn ag ef,
ac yn goleuo o’r newydd,
lle mentrwn dynnu edau.
Overture – Poetic Voice
Tri dechreuad ni ddechreuant:
y cwestiwn cyn ei ofyn,
yr edau cyn ei nyddu,
a’r stori nad yw’n gwybod mai stori ydyw.
Tri pheth a ddaw i’r meddwl heb ganiatâd:
y bore,
yr ymddiddan,
a’r syniad nad oes ei ollwng.
Tri chynllun sydd berffaith:
yr un a orffennwyd,
yr un na chyffyrddwyd ag ef,
a’r un nad oes enaid ynddo.
Tri byd sydd heb boen:
byd heb newyn,
byd heb lafur,
a byd heb hiraeth — a hwnnw yw’r gwaethaf.
Tri llwyth a ddygir heb eu gweld:
y sach ar y cefn,
y garreg yn y llaw,
a’r cwestiwn na fynn doddi.
Tri pheth sydd lymach na gwaedd:
distawrwydd plentyn,
hollt mewn gwydr,
a gofyn “pam” mewn trefn berffaith.
Tri lle y ceir gafael ynddynt:
ar yr anwastad,
ar y garw,
ac ar y man lle torrodd rhywbeth o’r blaen.
Tri pheth a feddala:
y gwlith,
y galon,
a’r stori sy’n dechrau gweu ei hun.
Tri pheth nid llyfr mohonynt:
gwead o feddwl,
cân o holi,
a phatrwm yn chwilio am ei ffurf ei hun.
Ni ellir rhifo’r trydydd peth.
Bûm gynllun.
Bûm y drefn a fu’n dal.
Yr wyf yn awr yn hollt,
yn crynu dan y bys,
yn goleuo lle mentrir tynnu edau.
Introduction
Liora a Gwehydd y Sêr: Alegori o Gwestiynau ac Edafedd
Yn gwisgo gwisg hudolus chwedl farddonol, mae «Liora a Gwehydd y Sêr» yn gofyn yr hen, hen gwestiwn: faint o’n bywydau sydd wir yn ddewis i ni ein hunain, a faint sydd wedi ei wehyddu ar ein cyfer ymlaen llaw? Mewn byd sy’n ymddangos yn berffaith, ac sy’n cael ei gynnal mewn harmoni llwyr gan rym goruchel—“Gwehydd y Sêr”—mae merch o’r enw Liora yn gofyn yn dawel: pam? I ddarllenydd a fagwyd yng ngwlad y beirdd, lle mae hen arwyddair yr Orsedd, “Y Gwir yn erbyn y Byd”, yn dal i atseinio, mae’r cwestiwn hwnnw’n taro tant ar unwaith: nid herio’r drefn er mwyn ei dryllio yw gofyn, ond ei pharchu’n ddigon dwfn i fyfyrio arni. Yn y bôn, dyma bledio addfwyn dros werth amherffeithrwydd a’r dewrder i ddal ati i holi.
Yn y distawrwydd sy’n dilyn storm neu yn llonyddwch y bore cyn i’r byd ddeffro, mae teimlad o hiraeth yn aml yn ymsefydlu yn yr enaid—nid fel hiraeth am le corfforol, ond fel dyhead am rywbeth mwy real na’r llyfnder a gynigir i ni gan y byd modern. Mae’r stori hon yn dechrau yn y man hwnnw. Mewn cyfnod lle mae algorithmau a threfn ddigidol yn gwehyddu ein dyddiau ac yn rhagweld ein dymuniadau, mae Liora yn ein hatgoffa mai’r "edau rydd" sy’n rhoi ystyr i’r gwead. Mae ei sach o gerrig holi yn cynrychioli’r pwysau y mae’n rhaid i ni i gyd ei gario os ydym am fod yn wirioneddol effro. Nid llyfr i blant yn unig yw hwn; mae’n ddrych i’r rhai sy’n teimlo bod perffeithrwydd yn gallu bod yn fodd i dagu’r ysbryd dynol.
Trwy ddefnyddio iaith sy’n atgoffa un o hen chwedlau ein cyndeidiau, mae’r awdur yn llwyddo i bontio’r bwlch rhwng y gorffennol chwedlonol a’r dyfodol technolegol. Mae’r tyndra rhwng Zamir, sy’n ceisio cadw’r patrwm yn ddi-fai, a Liora, sy’n gorfodi’r byd i ddatod ychydig, yn adlewyrchu’r frwydr rydym i gyd yn ei hwynebu: y dewis rhwng y drefn gysurus, ddistaw a’r rhyddid swnllyd, ansicr. Mae’r llyfr yn tyfu o fod yn stori syml i fod yn archwiliad dwfn o beth mae’n ei olygu i fod yn bensaer ein tynged ein hunain. Mae’n llyfr sy’n gwahodd teuluoedd i eistedd gyda’i gilydd a thrafod nid yn unig y stori, ond yr edafedd anweledig sy’n clymu ein bywydau ni.
Y olygfa sydd wedi aros yn ddwfn yn fy meddwl yw’r foment pan fo Zamir yn sefyll o flaen y rhwyg yn y gwead. Nid y rhwyg ei hun sy’n drawiadol, ond yr ymateb corfforol: y gwythien sy’n curo’n wyllt yn ei wddf a’i ddwylo medrus sy’n crafangu am drefn. Mae’r tyndra hwn yn darlunio’r boen o orfod cynnal ffasâd o gytgord pan fo’r realiti o’n cwmpas yn dechrau dadfeilio. Mae’n drosiad pwerus o’r pwysau cymdeithasol i ymddangos yn berffaith mewn byd sy’n canmol llyfnder dros onestrwydd. Yn yr eiliad honno, gwelir bod y system—er ei holl nerth—yn fregus, a bod y rhai sy’n ei gwasanaethu yn talu pris uchel mewn unigrwydd a straen. Mae’n ein gorfodi i ofyn: a ydym yn gwehyddu caneuon sy’n wir i ni, ynteu a ydym dim ond yn ailadrodd alawon y mae rhywun arall wedi eu nyddu ar ein cyfer?
Reading Sample
Cipolwg ar y Llyfr
Rydym yn eich gwahodd i ddarllen dau foment o'r stori. Y cyntaf yw'r dechrau – meddwl tawel a ddaeth yn stori. Yr ail yw moment o ganol y llyfr, lle mae Liora yn sylweddoli nad perffeithrwydd yw diwedd y chwilio, ond yn aml ei garchar.
Sut Dechreuodd Y Cyfan
Nid "Unwaith, ers talwm" clasurol yw hyn. Dyma'r foment cyn i'r edau gyntaf gael ei nyddu. Agoriad athronyddol sy'n gosod naws y daith.
Nid fel chwedl y dechreuodd,
ond fel cwestiwn –
un na fynnai dewi.
Un bore Sadwrn.
Sgwrs am oruwch-ddeallusrwydd,
meddwl na ellid ei ysgwyd ymaith.
Ar y cyntaf, nid oedd ond amlinelliad.
Oer.
Trefnus.
Di-enaid.
Byd heb newyn,
heb loes llafur.
Ond gwag o’r cryndod hwnnw:
hiraeth.
Yna, camodd merch i’r cylch.
A’i sach yn trymhau
dan bwysau cerrig holi.
Y Dewrder i Fod yn Amherffaith
Mewn byd lle mae "Gwehydd y Sêr" yn cywiro pob camgymeriad ar unwaith, mae Liora yn canfod rhywbeth gwaharddedig ym Marchnad y Golau: Darn o frethyn a adawyd heb ei orffen. Cyfarfod â'r hen dorrwr golau Joram sy'n newid popeth.
Camodd Liora ymlaen yn bwyllog,
nes iddi sylwi ar Joram, hen dorrwr golau.
Roedd ei lygaid yn anarferol.
Y naill yn loyw ac o frown dwfn,
yn archwilio’r byd yn astud.
A’r llall wedi ei orchuddio â niwl llaethog,
fel pe na bai’n edrych allan ar bethau,
ond i mewn ar amser ei hun.
Arhosodd golwg Liora ar gornel y bwrdd.
Rhwng y stribedi disglair, perffaith,
gorweddai darnau llai, prinach.
Crynai’r golau ynddynt yn afreolaidd,
fel pe bai’n anadlu.
Mewn un man torrai’r patrwm,
a hongiai un edau welw allan
ac yn cyrlio mewn awel anweledig,
gwahoddiad mud i barhau.
[...]
Cymerodd Joram edau o olau carpiog o’r gornel.
Ni roddodd ef gyda’r rholiau perffaith,
ond ar ymyl y bwrdd,
lle’r oedd y plant yn mynd heibio.
“Mae rhai edafedd yn cael eu geni i gael eu darganfod”, mumianodd,
a nawr ymddangosai’r llais fel pe bai’n dod o ddyfnder ei lygad llaethog,
“Nid i aros yn gudd.”
Cultural Perspective
An Answer, No an Echo
Liora an the Starn-Weaver, frae the glint o a Welsh makar
Whan I first read aboot Liora's warld — thon braw warld wi nae hunger, nae trauchle o wark, "wi no ae unneedfu note" — I didna feel unco. I kent it fine. For we in Wales hae lived neist-door tae this warld for a thoosand years, an hae argued wi it, no in philosophie, but in poetry. This tale cam frae German, wis re-woven in Welsh, an crossin thon doorstane, it cam, aiblins athoot kennin it, hame.
Tak tent o ae word in the middle o the description o the Mercat o Licht. Tae pent the warld afore Liora rave it sindry, the translator waled a phrase that only a Welshman can richt unnerstaun: ilka stall, it wis said, "wis like a completed Cynghanedd (traditional Welsh strict meter an harmony)". That is the key tae the haill story. For tae us, Cynghanedd isna juist a bonnie metaphor. It is oor auldest wey o speirin the exact same question that burns in Liora's hert: whit is the difference atween a harmony that is alive an a harmony that is deid?
The Completed Harmony
Strict meter poetry is ane o the maist disciplined airtistic systems man has ever wrocht. Consonants maun answer ilk ither across the line conformin tae rules aulder nor mony o oor castles. Frae the haun o a maister like Dafydd ap Gwilym, this restriction turns intae flicht. But onybody wha has ever sat in a poetry competition kens there are twa kinds o harmony. There is the harmony that is richt — ilka consonant in its place, no ae mistak, "flawless order, like cauld steel" — but whilk is deid. An there is the harmony that is alive, whaur the rule has ceased tae be a chain an has become a wing.
That is exactly the warld o the Starn-Weaver. It is perfectly richt. Ilka threid is in its place; there isna ae mistak; the cloods mak "identical smiles". An yet it is deid — or, tae be preceese, it hasna yet begun tae live. Whit is missin is the ae thing nae architect can gie: Hiraeth (a deep, nostalgic yearnin). Whan Liora gaithers her Stanes o Speirin, she isna creatin stramash. She is daein whit ilka true makar does — refusin tae settle for deid precision, an demandin that the line comes alive.
An there is a hidden sign that the translator unnerstauns this perfectly. Becaise he didna juist settle for translatin the story intae prose. In the middle o the beuk, he steppit intae the strict meters hissel an wrocht a poem. Whan Liora's arrival is telt o, we hear it in poetry:
Then a lassie cam intae the ring wi her poke,
An her hivy stanes in a warld sae hale.
The lassie carryin questions arrives, therefore, no in a sentence, but in metric harmony. The beuk couldna hae said ony clearer that it unnerstauns it noo belangs tae oor tradeetion.
The Restin Place (The Caesura)
This is the hert o it, an the truth that I trow nae Welsh reader will ever forget. In oor harmony, accord doesna mean uniformity. It isna an echo. Indeed, a line whaur the seicont half repeats the first would be an absolute failure — the flaw we caa "repetition". Whit we demand is an answer: that the seicont half o the line taks the consonantal banes o the first an answers them wi a new flesh o vowels. It is a correspondence atween twa different things, no a union o twa identical things.
An for that answer tae be possible, there maun be a break. The line is divided by a pause we caa Gorffwysfa — a word that literally means restin place. Athoot that gap, ae half canna turn tae the ither tae answer it. That is the secret the Starn-Weaver missed: he wrocht a weave athoot a restin place. An unbroken, bonnie, bund line that could never turn back on itsel. A bizz, no a sang.
An this is why — an read this slawly — the tear in the lift isna a disaster. The tear is the restin place that finally cam tae a warld that never had ane. Tak tent that the exact word the translator waled for the moment o silence afore the answer is didolnod calon — the caesura o the hert, the grammatical mark that spleets ae clause frae anither. This isna a story aboot shatterin a perfect warld. It is a story aboot giein a perfect warld the ae thing that wis missin: the pause that allous for an answer. It isna the crack that gies life. The decision tae reweave across the crack — the answer in the seicont half o the line — that is the life.
The Harp an the Voice
If this is still ower abstract, listen tae music. We hae an airt in Wales caad Cerdd Dant (singin wi a harp). It is dune like this: the harpist plays an auld, set melody — a melody that canna be changed, a melody that wis inherited. Then the voice comes in, entirely alane, tae sing anither melody against it. The voice maun never hit the same notes as the harp at the same time; an yet it maun reach the end wi the harp, as ane. That is the craft: tae be free, an yet tae belang.
Whan Liora sat at the feet o the Whisperin Tree, she wis taucht wi words that nae Welshman could read athoot smilin: "it gies the notes, but ye wile the melody". That isna an alien philosophy tae us. It is a literal description o harp singin. The harp is the Starn-Weaver, giein the set melody; Liora is the singer, receivin the notes an wailin her ain melody against them. Puir Zamir trows that only ae melody is possible — the gien ane. He doesna yet ken that it is possible tae sing against the harp athoot destroyin it.
An we see this answer reach its firmness at the end o the beuk. Whan Liora returns years later, she sees the lassie wha aince held a burd ower tichtly weavin again wi a sicker haun. Whaur the scar wis, the story says, there is noo "nae langer a scar, but a barely veesible featur in her personal pattern". That is the voice reachin the cadence wi the harp. The difference wisna erased; it wis resolved in a richer harmony. An answer, no an echo.
The Black Chair
Noo tae the thing that astoondit me the maist, an whilk pruves, I trow, that the scriever o this story isna a stranger tae us ava. Whan Zamir's hert is broken, whan meanin fades frae his warld, he gies voice tae his despair. An thir are the words pit in his mou:
Wae's me tae live in sic a black age,
An meanin ebbin on a faur horizon...
Ilka Welshman will recognise this rhythm instantly. It is oor nation's maist famous poem, "War", by the Welsh makar Hedd Wyn: "Wae's me tae live in sic a bleak age, / An God ebbin on a faur horizon." Only ae word wis changed: insteid o God's retreat, it is meanin's retreat. An that is perfect, becaise that is exactly Zamir's crisis — no the loss o God, but the loss o certainty that the pattern has ony meanin ava.
But listen tae why invokin Hedd Wyn here strikes sae deep. In 1917, Hedd Wyn won the chair o the National Eisteddfod (the poetry festival). But he had awready been kilt in battle weeks prior. Whan his name wis caad, naebody stude up. The empty chair wis draped wi a black claith, an ever syne it has been caad the Black Chair. Wales learnt a thing that day that has never been forgotten: that the chair can be won by the absent, an that the sang can be completed by silence.
That is exactly whit the beuk teaches aboot the mature Zamir. His melodies, it is said, become the purest o aw — an whit that means is that they are sae clear "that in their mids ane could hear the silence aroond a single, unsung note". The note that isna sung is the empty chair o ilka great sang. Whit is missin is whit gies the haill its meanin.
An that is why Liora's quiet institution — the "Sanctuary o Waitin for Knawledge" — feels sae familiar. It is a ring whaur fowk haud space for a question that canna yet be answered; whaur a haun rests flat on the yird tae anchor the silence. That is the ring o makars. An the motto abune it — "He wha speirs, saws" — whilk imitates the form o oor auld proverbs, says that the question isna a wappen o destruction, but a seed. We mind that the makar Waldo Williams, whan speired whit knawledge wis, answered: "Tae hae ae ruit / Unner the branches." An that is exactly whit the Whisperin Tree is, "connectit tae the yird through unco ruits an tae the lift through unco branches" — the ruit unner the branches, whaur the question an its answer become ane.
A Word tae the Stranger
If ye hae cam tae this essay in anither language, let me offer ye whit Wales can bring tae yer readin o Liora. In mony mindsets, harmony is considered greement — meltin aabody intae a single voice, erasin the difference. Oor tradeetion demands itherwise. For us, harmony is twa things keepin their difference an yet answerin ilk ither across a gap creatit on purpose. The voice that never hits the harp's note, yet meets it in the end. The consonant that answers the consonant athoot repeatin the vowel.
If ye accept that, it will change twa sangs in the beuk. First, dinna mistak Hiraeth (yearnin) for sadness. Yearnin isna grief; it is a pu — the pu o the lowse threid, the thing no yet woven, caain on ye tae spin it. Yearnin is Liora's saul mindin that she hasna yet been gien her ain sang. An seicont, dinna see freedom an belangin as enemies. In the Welsh weave, the lowse threid is exactly whit maks the deid weave come alive. Liora doesna abandon the pattern. She saves it.
The Threid Left Ahint
I will end, as a makar should, wi a confession an an offerin. There is an endin in the beuk whaur we hear the Architects theirsels — thaim wha calculated "the logic o pain an the mathematics o yearnin" — confess somethin terrible: "The architect can plan the tear, but only the tear can feel itsel." They biggit the hoose, they say, but they dinna bide in it. That is the ultimate difference atween the ane wha calculates a sang an the ane wha sings it. An that is why, I trow, the scriever — a computer scientist watchin machines learn tae spin — gied the beuk tae a lassie, an no tae an architect.
Let me therefore lay a threid o my ain afore the chair. In oor metrics, a word within the line answers the stressed soond o the last word — ae half caas, an the ither answers. An this is my line for Liora, she whase name means "my licht":
Frae creation comes the licht.
I will lea it there humbly, juist as the mither left a pod an a dried flouer atween the stanes — "no as a wairnin, no as a prohibition," but as a sign. Mey a better makar than I wey it; for the chair, like ony true chair, waits tae be won by someane wha hasna yet arrived. That is hoo oor airt works, an that is hoo Liora's warld works: leavin a gap for the ane wha will find theirsels.
Flee, Liora. The notes hae been gien. Yer melody is the sang.
An essay by a makar frae Wales, in honour o Liora an the Starn-Weaver.
Afterword
Efter Readin the Warld
Whan Ah opened this file – a thoosand pages o cultural responses tae the same story – Ah felt the same as staundin oan the tap o Cadair Idris in the mist an hearin voices frae aw directions. Ah didnae expect this direction – tae witness hou Liora an her speirin stanes hae rung sae mony different bells across the yird. Ma Welsh langin for unnerstaunin is nou transformed intae somethin mair: intae fun, that excitin speerit that kythes whan ideas clash an harmonise at the same time.
The first thing that struck me wis hou the Japanese see Liora through the lens o mono no aware – the sadness o things passin. Whan Ah saw them descrivin the speirin stanes as Omoi-ishi, stanes that haud the wecht o grief an langin, Ah realised ma Welsh idea o memory stanes wis ower licht. Tae them, these are nae memorial stanes, but symbols o the bonnie emptiness that gies space for meanin tae grow. This is darker, mair passive than oor wey o wechtin moments. But yet, amang their geometric stillness, Ah foond a reference tae ma – the empty space that speaks – an suddenly recognised oor ain silence, the stillness that faas in St Davids whaur centuries o prayer hae made the verra air feel heavy.
Then cam the shock o discoverin the Koreans talkin aboot han – the deep sorrow, the voiceless pain that bides in the nation. Ah thocht we, the Scots, were the keepers o langin – thae feelins o nameless loss, o seekin a hame that's already there but never quite hale. But han is different. It's mair violent, mair dark. Whan the reviewer frae Seoul said Liora cairries the burden o generations o unasked questions, Ah realised oor langin is lichtlier, mair hopeful. Langin disnae scar; it soothes. Han burns.
An yet, unexpectedly, Ah saw a connection atween the Scots feelins an the Swahili frae the City o Dar es Salaam. Whan they spoke o ubuntu – that we are persons through ithers – Ah saw an echo o oor idea o community, o hou each speirin stane connects tae the hale. We dinnae hae a word like ubuntu, but the speerit's there in oor tradition o giein a cuddle, o keepin warmth despite the winter. It's amazin hou twa traditions sae different – ane frae the damp uplands o Scotland an the ither frae the tropical heat o East Africa – can reach the same fundamental unnerstaunin: that the self disnae exist alane.
But the maist strikin lesson wis the ane Ah'd never hae thocht o masel: the reviewer frae Beijing describin the Whisperin Tree as Hunyi – the armillary sphere uised by the Emperor's astronomers tae measure the heavens. Tae us, the Tree is a place tae listen, an ancient tree whaur answers whisper in the leaves. But tae the Chinese, it's an imperial machine, a tool tae determine fate. The difference speaks volumes: that we seek comfort in nature, while they see mathematics in serenity. An yet, baith believe the patterns exist. It's juist oor faith in the question that divides us – we think listenin can undo the order; they believe the order's ower auld tae break, but maybe worth adaptin.
Ah noticed somethin tae in the Portuguese review – the idea o saudade, the dark langin for somethin that never wis. It's different frae oor langin. Saudade is mair romantic, mair mortal. They love the loss itsel. We try tae mend it. But in the review frae São Paulo, Ah saw them describin jeitinho brasileiro – the ability tae find a creative solution whan the system's ower rigid. That's whaur their hope hides, no in the loss, but in the sly, excitin answer. Ah realised we Scots are somewhere in the middle – carryin the langin but smilin as we find a wey through the problems. We've got oor ain jeitinho, but we cry it fun.
An efter readin it aw, whit remains? Here's the truth: every culture has seen a different stane in Liora's bag. The Arabs see sabr – the spiritual patience that lets ye resist fate. The French see broken Cartesianism – the pleasure o analysin a system that's already faain apairt. The Russians see dusha – the deep, heavy soul that maun suffer tae ken. An us Scots? We see a question that belangs tae awbody but is also uniquely personal, stuck atween the community an the self.
Whit dis this teach me aboot ma ain culture? That oor wey o readin – wi langin but wi optimism, wi respect for the order but wi a desire tae challenge it – is ane possibility amang dozens. It's no better than the ithers, but it's no worse either. It's a wey o livin that's grown frae oor land, oor history, oor language. An the fact that there are 49 ither weys tae read the same words means the story itsel is mair than aw the interpretations. It shows somethin aboot whit is common an unique at the same time – the need tae ask, the danger o knowin, an the hope that the broken pattern can be rewoven stronger.
Sae, if ye've read yer ain version o Liora an think ye unnerstaun it, dae yersel a favour: read the ither reviews. Dinnae look for word-for-word translations, but for soul exchanges. Because whan ye see hou folk frae Seoul mourn the same lassie ye praise, or hou folk frae Delhi see justice whaur ye see love, ye'll realise somethin important: it's no us readin the story. It's the story readin us.
Backstory
Frae Code tae Soul: The Refactoring o a Tale
Ma name is Jörn von Holten. Ah come frae a generation o computer scientists that didnae find the digital warld as a given, but built it stane by stane. At university, Ah wis ane o thae folk fur whom terms like "expert systems" an "neural networks" were nae science fiction, but fascinatin, though still raw, tools. Ah early realised the vast potential o these technologies – but Ah also learned tae respect their limits.
The day, decades later, Ah watch the hype aboot "Artificial Intelligence" wi the threefauld perspective o an experienced practitioner, an academic, an an aesthete. As someone deeply rooted in the warld o literature an the beauty o language, Ah see the current developments wi mixed feelins: Ah see the technological breakthrough we’ve waited thirty years fur. But Ah also see a naive carelessness, wi which unpolished technology is thrown tae the market – often wi nae regard fur the delicate cultural fabric that hauds oor society thegither.
The Spark: A Saturday Mornin
This project didnae begin oan the drawin board, but frae a deep inner need. Efter a discussion aboot superintelligence oan a Saturday mornin, interrupted by the clamour o daily life, Ah sought a way tae tackle complex questions no technically, but humanly. That’s hoo Liora came tae be.
Initially intended as a fairytale, the ambition grew wi every line. Ah realised: If we’re tae speak aboot the future o humans an machines, we cannae dae it just in German. We hae tae dae it globally.
The Human Foundation
But afore even a single byte flowed through an AI, there wis the human. Ah work in a very international company. Ma daily reality isnae code, but conversations wi colleagues frae China, the USA, France, or India. It wis these real, analogue encounters – by the coffee machine, in video conferences, at dinners – that truly opened ma eyes.
Ah learned that terms like "freedom," "duty," or "harmony" sound completely different tae the ears o a Japanese colleague compared tae ma ain German ears. These human resonances were the first notes in ma score. They provided the soul that nae machine can ever simulate.
Refactoring: The Orchestra o Humans an Machines
Here began the process that, as a computer scientist, Ah can only describe as "refactoring." In software development, refactoring means improvin the inner code withoot changin the ootward behaviour – makin it cleaner, mair universal, mair robust. That’s exactly whit Ah did wi Liora, fur this systematic approach is deeply rüted in ma professional DNA.
Ah assembled a completely novel orchestra:
- On the ane side: Ma human friends an colleagues wi their cultural wisdom an life experience. (A massive thank ye here tae aw who discussed an continue tae discuss wi me).
- On the ither side: The maist advanced AI systems (like Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude, DeepSeek, Grok, Qwen, an ithers), which Ah didnae use merely as translators but as "cultural sparrin partners," because they also brought up associations that Ah sometimes admired an at the same time found unsettling. Ah gledly welcome ither perspectives, even if they dinnae directly come frae a human.
Ah let them interact, debate, an mak suggestions. This interplay wis nae one-way street. It wis a vast, creative feedback process. If the AI (based oan Chinese philosophy) pointed oot that a certain action o Liora’s would be seen as disrespectful in the Asian culture, or if a French colleague noted that a metaphor sounded too technical, Ah didnae just adjust the translation. Ah reflected oan the "source code" an often changed it. Ah went back tae the German original text an rewrote it. The Japanese understanding o harmony made the German text mair mature. The African perspective oan community made the dialogues a lot warmer.
The Conductor
In this roarin concert o 50 languages an thoosands o cultural nuances, ma role wis nae longer that o the author in the classical sense. Ah became the conductor. Machines can produce tones, an humans can feel emotions – but it takes someone tae decide when each instrument should come in. Ah had tae decide: When is the AI richt wi its logical analysis o language? An when is the human richt wi their intuition?
This conductin wis exhaustin. It required humility afore foreign cultures an at the same time a steady haun tae ensure the core message o the story didnae get diluted. Ah tried tae lead the score so that in the end, 50 language versions emerged that micht sound different but aw sing the exact same sang. Each version noo carries its ain cultural hue – an yet, Ah've poured a piece o ma soul intae every line, purified through the filter o this global orchestra.
An Invitation tae the Concert Hall
This website is noo that concert hall. Whit ye’ll find here isnae just a simple translated book. It’s a polyphonic essay, a document o the refactoring o an idea through the spirit o the warld. The texts ye’ll read are often technically generated, but humanly initiated, controlled, curated, an, o course, orchestrated.
Ah invite ye: Tak advantage o the opportunity tae switch between languages. Compare them. Feel the differences. Be critical. Fur in the end, we’re aw part o this orchestra – seekers tryin tae find the human melody amid the noise o technology.
In fact, in the tradition o the film industry, Ah should noo write a comprehensive 'Makin-o' in book form that analyses aw thae cultural pitfalls an linguistic nuances.
This image wis designed by an airtifeecial intelligence, usin the culturally rewoven translation o the buik as its guide. Its task wis tae create a culturally resonant back cover image that wad captivate native readers, alang wi an explanation o why the imagery is suitable. As the German author, Ah foond maist o the designs appealing, but Ah wis deeply impressed by the creativity the AI ultimately achieved. Obviously, the results needed tae convince me first, an some attempts failed due tae poleetical or releegious reasons, or simply because they didnae fit. Enjoy the picture—which features on the buik's back cover—an please tak a moment tae explore the explanation below.
For a Welsh reader, this image strikes a chord that vibrates far deeper than the scenic green hills aften selt tae tourists. It bypasses the pastoral an digs directly intae the geological soul o the nation: the daurkness o the unnergrund an the heat o transformation.
The bubblin vessel in the foreground isnae merely a pot; it evokes the ancient mythological Pair (Cauldron)—reminiscent o the Cauldron o Rebirth or the vessel o Ceridwen frae the Mabinogi legends. It contains the molten essence o Liora’s speerit. In the story, Liora gathers Cerrig Holi (Question Stanes), heavy an cauld. Here, we see whit happens when thae stanes are subjected tae the heat o Hiraeth (that fierce, bane-deep langin). They dae no remain cauld wecht; they melt intae liquid gowd, becomin a force capable o unmakin the warld.
The backgrund is constructed o jagged, blue-grey Llechfaen (Slate). Tae the Welsh ee, slate is mair than rock; it is the skin o history, the ruif o the chapel, an the waw o the mine. It represents the Gwead (The Weave) in its maist rigid, industrial form—a cauld, layered destiny that crushes as much as it protects. Blockin the way is a rusted iron portcullis, echoin the "Iron Ring" o castles that aince caged the land. This is the Star-Weaver’s design: an ancient, immovable grid o logic an control.
The true pouer o the image lies in the interaction atween thae elements. The Gwehydd y Sêr (Star-Weaver) biggit a cage o iron an slate tae keep the pattern perfect an static. But Liora’s "Question" is risin frae the cauldron, dissolvin the rusted bars o fate. It captures the story’s central truth: that the cauld architecture o destiny cannae withstand the molten heat o a single, darin question.